نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه اقتصاد، واحد اسلامشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اسلامشهر، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مهندسی مالی، واحد اسلامشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اسلامشهر، ایران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش آزمون اثرگذاری مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی از طریق نقش تعدیل گر متغیرهای حاکمیت شرکتی بر شاخص مدیریت سود تعدیل شده جونز برای گروه بانکها و مؤسسات مالی پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران می باشد. در این پژوهش، متغیرهای مستقل، کارت امتیازی مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی شرکت و عوامل حاکمیت شرکتی، شاخص مدیریت سود تعدیل شده جونز به عنوان متغیر وابسته و اندازه شرکت، اهرم مالی و سن به عنوان متغیرهای کنترلی هستند. جامعه پژوهش با توجه به موضوع و کاربرد آن برای گروه بانکها و مؤسسات مالی فعال در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران می باشد. در این مطالعه 41 بانک و مؤسسه مالی اعتباری نمونه انتخاب شدند. در این تحقیق از داده های نمونه آماری مورد نظر از سال 1397 تا پایان سال 1401 به مدت پنج سال برای جمع آوری استفاده شد. در این تحقیق، تحلیل رگرسیون چند متغیره با استفاده از روش داده های تابلویی با اثرات ثابت به بررسی فرضیه می پردازد. نتایج نشان داد که بین مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی و شاخص مدیریت سود تعدیل شده جونز شرکت رابطه مستقیم و معناداری وجود دارد. اندازه هیئت مدیره و استقلال هیئت مدیره به عنوان عوامل حاکمیت شرکتی، رابطه بین مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی و شاخص مدیریت سود تعدیل شده جونز را اصلاح می کند. اما مالکیت دولت بر رابطه بین مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی و شاخص مدیریت سود تعدیل شده جونز شرکت تأثیری ندارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Testing the Impact of Social Responsibility Through the Moderating Role of Corporate Governance Variables on Jones' Adjusted Earnings Management Index for Banks and Financial Institutions Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange

نویسندگان [English]

  • Akbar Bagheri 1
  • Hassan Abagheri 2
  • Delaram Torabi 2
  • Ebrahim Molla Ahmadi Namin 2

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran

2 PhD Student, Financial engineering, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research is to test the effect of social responsibility through the moderating role of corporate governance variables on Jones' adjusted earnings management index for the group of banks and financial institutions admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange. In this research, the independent variables are the corporate social responsibility scorecard and corporate governance factors, Jones' adjusted earnings management index as the dependent variable, and company size, financial leverage, and age as the control variables. According to the topic and its application, the research community is for the group of banks and financial institutions active in the Tehran Stock Exchange. In this study, 41 banks and credit financial institutions were selected. In this research, the data of the desired statistical sample was used to collect for five years from 2017 to the end of 2011. In this research, multivariate regression analysis using panel data method with fixed effects examines the hypothesis. The results showed that there is a direct and significant relationship between social responsibility and the adjusted earnings management index of Jones Company. Board size and board independence as factors of corporate governance moderate the relationship between social responsibility and the Jones adjusted earnings management index. But government ownership does not affect the relationship between corporate social responsibility and the adjusted earnings management index of Jones Corporation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social responsibility
  • corporate governance
  • Jones Adjusted Earnings Management Index
  • Banks and Financial Institutions Group
  • Tehran Stock Exchange
  1. سعیدی، رضا، احمدی محمدعلی و رضوی ریحانه. (2015). رویکرد و تحلیل MCDM فازی یکپارچه برای ارزیابی عملکرد مالی شرکت‌های سیمان ایران، مجله علوم زندگی 10(5):570-586.
  2. رنگریز، حمید (1391). ارزیابی عملکرد شرکت‌های سیمان ایران بر اساس روش‌های AHP و TOPSIS، مجله فنی مهندسی و علوم کاربردی، 2 (9): 285-292.
  3. Afiff, S., & Anantadjaya, S. P.‌ (2020). CSR & Performance: Any Evidence from Indonesian LQ45?. Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research‌, 2(1), 85-101
  4. Agnes Cheng, C. S., & Reitenga, A. (2019). Characteristics of institutional investors and discretionary accruals. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 17(1), 5–26.
  5. Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., & Hatfield, J. (2018). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation vary by position in the organizational hierarchy?. Bus. 28 (3), 23-32.
  6. Black, B., Love, I., & Rachinsky, A. (2006). Corporate Governance Indices and Firm’s Market Value: Time Series Evidence Form Russia. Emerging Markets Review, 7, 361-379.
  7. A. (2011). The Relationship between Corporate SocialResponsibility and Financial Performance: an empirical study of companies included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index [Master dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam], Erasmus School of Economics, Accounting, Auditing and Control, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  8. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporation social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719.
  9. Carver, J. (2010). A case for global governance theory: practitioners avoid it, academics narrow it, the world needs it. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 149-157.
  10. Castelo, M., & Lima, L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 111-132.
  11. Comincioli, Nicola, Laura, Poddi & Sergio, Vergalli (2012), Corporate‌ Social‌ Responsibility and Firm's Performance: a strati graphical Analysis, Publication Note di Lavoro, Available‌ at‌ SSRN:http://com/abstract=2132202, 1395‌/08‌/22‌.
  12. Cornett, M., Marcus, A. J, Saunders, A., & Tehranien, H. (2006). Earnings management, corporate governance, and true financial performance. Working Papers, SSRN, 1-28.
  13. Davis, A.K., Guenther, D.A., Krull, L.K., & Williams, B.M. (2016). Do Socially Responsible Firms Pay More Taxes?. The Accounting Review, 91(1), 47-68.
  14. Deegan, C. (2006). Financial Accounting Theory, Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education
  15. Dittmar, A., & Mahrt-Smith, J.(2007). Corporate Governance and the Value of Cash Holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 83(3), 599-634.
  16. Doh, J.P., Bunyaratavej, K., & Hahn, E. (2009). Separable but not equal: the location determinants of discrete services offshoring activities. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 926-943.
  17. Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). The separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
  18. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy. 88(2), 288-307.
  19. Fisher, J.M. (2014). Fairer shores: Tax havens, tax avoidance, and corporate social responsibility. Boston University Law Review, 94, 337-365.
  20. Fleming, M. (2002). What is safety culture? Rail way safety ever green House, Available at: www.google.com \rwf\.
  21. Galli, D., Elefanti, M., & Valotti, G. (2013). From Corporate To Shared Social Responsibility: Community Governance and Social Capital Creation Through Collaboration. APPAM International Conference: Collaboration Among Government, Market, and Society: Forging Partnerships and Encouraging Competition, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, May 26-27, 2013
  22. A. (2008). Three Models of Corporate Social Responsibility: Interrelationships between Theory, Research, and Practice. Business and Society Review. 113, 1-41
  23. Gjolberg, M. (2014). Explaining Regulatory Preferences: CSR, Soft Law, or Hard Law? Insights from a Survey of Nordic Pioneers in CSR. Business and Politics, 13(2), 1-31.
  24. Gones, M. (2005). The Origin of Corporate Social Responsibility: Global Forces or National Legacies. Socio- Economic Review, 7, 605–637.
  25. Green, S. (2005). Sarbanes Oxley and the Board of Directors. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jercy.
  26. Hadani, M., Goranova, M., & Khan, R. (2011). Institutional investors, shareholder activism, and earnings management. Journal of Business Research, 64(12), 1352–1360.
  27. Hermanson, D.R., & Rittenberg. (2003). Internal Audit and Organizational Governance. (2003, http:/www.Theiia.org).
  28. Hess, D., & Warren, D. (2008). The meaning and meaningfulness of corporate social initiatives. Business and Society Review, 113(2), 163-197.
  29. Hoi, Ch., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2014). Is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Associated with Tax Avoidance? Evidence from Irresponsible CSR Activities. Saunders College of Business, Rochester Institute of Technology.
  30. Huang, Chi-Jui. (2010). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and corporate performance. Journal of Management and Organization, 16(5), 641-655.
  31. Kabir, R., & Minh Thai, H. (2020). Does corporate governance shape the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance?. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(2), 1-40.
  32. Visser, W. (2012). The Age of Responsibility: CSR0 and the New DNA of Business, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  33. Yalcin, N. (2012). Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries, Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1) 350-364.
  34. Zack, D. and et al. (2009) An Integrated Dynamic performance Measurement system for Improving Manufacturing competitiveness, International Journal of Production Economics, 48,pp.25-207.